CDC faces new LAWSUIT challenging Medicaid-reimbursed medical experiments that are targeting low income families, ruining children’s health

The CDC stands accused of orchestrating an unconstitutional scheme to weaponize poverty against American families and specifically on the health of children. A groundbreaking federal lawsuit, backed by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), charges the agency with using the Vaccines for Children program—designed to protect vulnerable populations—to coerce doctors into mass-distributing experimental COVID vaccines to Medicaid-enrolled children. At the center is Dr. Samara Cardenas, a pediatrician who lost her medical practice weeks after refusing to comply with VFC mandates that prioritized federal vaccine agendas over medical judgment. The stakes are nothing less than the survival of constitutional freedoms and the integrity of the medical profession. An entire generation of low income families and the health of their children hangs in the balance.

Key points:

• California pediatrician Dr. Samara Cardenas leads a constitutional challenge against the CDC’s VFC program for forcing doctors to administer experimental vaccines or risk losing Medicaid access.
• Lawsuit alleges CDC’s Vaccines for Children (VFC) program violates privacy and due process rights by treating Medicaid-enrolled children as second-class citizens.
• Evidence reveals the CDC ignored severe adverse events, skipped transparency with VFC pilots in low-income populations, and relied on conflicted policymakers.
• COVID vaccines continue to be distributed to children and adults, exploiting human biology and leading to further health issues and immune depletion.

Immunization autocracy: How the CDC weaponizes Medicaid

The CDC’s Vaccines for Children Program, originally intended to vaccinate uninsured youth, has become the enforcement arm of a controversial experimental vaccine rollout. California mandates that all pediatricians treating Medicaid patients must enroll in this program, which now compels compliance with every CDC-recommended shot — including unlicensed, emergency-use-only (EUA) COVID vaccines.

“This isn’t just a medical issue. It’s a tool of social control,” stated CHD attorney Ray Flores. “The CDC’s threat: Vaccinate or stop caring for the poor.” Disobedience meant Dr. Cardenas’s practice was summarily axed after she refused to inject healthy children with shots linked to heart inflammation and death. Her lawsuit argues this violates the Fifth Amendment’s equal protection clause, as Medicaid children receive zero vaccine safety oversight compared to the general public.

Documents released in the case reveal that even as the UK, Sweden, and Denmark abandoned mass-child vaccination strategies in the name of safety, the CDC doubled down, pressuring its advisory board to cement EUA vaccines into the standard pediatric schedule. CHD champions Dr. Michelle Perro condemn the practice as “medical fascism,” noting the financial consequences force physicians to choose between morality and ruin.

Whose Science? Fractured data and financial conflicts plague CDC’s vaccine push

The lawsuit exposes systemic corruption within the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), whose members face documented ties to vaccine manufacturers. Allegations claim the CDC ignored core safety protocols, conducting “no independent analysis of VAERS injury reports” while rushing into regulations that trapped millions of children into experimental treatments.

The data on this is damning. VAERS lists over 70,000 adverse events from pediatric vaccines, including over 200 deaths — with experts like VAERSAware founder Albert Benavides asserting the true toll exceeds 500 fatalities. Meanwhile, the CDC’s defenders, like ACIP member Dr. Denise Jamieson, prioritize “public confusion avoidance” over transparency.

“What happened to ‘first do no harm’?” asks CHD’s Karl Jablonowski. “Emergency vaccine licenses are permission to skip testing, not canvass neighborhoods with unproven biologics.” Even Pfizer’s own trial documents ahead of kids’ vaccine authorizations show prior myocarditis concerns, further fueling charges agencies knew the risks but silenced dissent.

Targeting low-income families for depopulation

While the CDC pushed escalating doses, international peers began retreat. The UK halted boosters for under-50s, citing lingering natural immunity and vaccine risks. A pediatric study recently revealed vaccinated toddlers faced higher infection rates than unvaccinated peers with prior exposure, while another linked Pfizer’s shots to sustained spike protein production years later.

“What’s the CDC’s endgame here?” demands attorney Rick Jaffe, pointing to the agency’s refusal even to consider risk-stratified guidelines. “Italy, Canada, and Austria already discarded universal mandates for children. Why isn’t the US?”

The case intersects with harrowing parallels to historical medical exploitation. CHD’s Kim Mack Rosenberg notes that Black, Indigenous, and low-income communities—disproportionately on Medicaid—face decades of harmful “public health” experiments, from the Tuskegee syphilis study to today’s coercive vaccine programs.

As Dr. Cardenas’ courtroom battle continues, a haunting truth emerges: America’s front line caregivers now have two choices — become tools of dubious vaccine policy or stand up for the most vulnerable patients, families, and children. The CDC’s “safety net” VFC program now looks more like a cage of compromised licensors, dispensing uncertain science to those least able to advocate for themselves.

The critical question remains unresolved: Can a free society allow bureaucrats to dictate inalienable bodily rights in exchange for Medicaid assistance? Or will justice finally declare that every human, regardless of income, deserves autonomy over their biology?

Sources include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

ChildrensHealthDefense.org [PDF]